SMITH SHAPOURIAN MIGNANO PC - SAN FRANCISCO LAW FIRM FOR STARTUPS AND SMALL BUSINESSES
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Teela Crosthwaite Smith
    • Neda Shapourian
    • Lindsey S. Mignano
    • Kelly Lawton-Abbott
    • Jason D. Crain
    • Amy Carpio-Bruno
    • Jordan T. Lee
  • Services
  • News
  • Blog
  • DEI Policy
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Teela Crosthwaite Smith
    • Neda Shapourian
    • Lindsey S. Mignano
    • Kelly Lawton-Abbott
    • Jason D. Crain
    • Amy Carpio-Bruno
    • Jordan T. Lee
  • Services
  • News
  • Blog
  • DEI Policy
  • Contact
Search

blog

Before you Sign the Dotted Line: Considerations regarding "sweat equity" agreements

9/11/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Here at Smith Shapourian Mignano PC, some startups inquire whether they should issue equity to service providers such as engineering firms or mobile application developpers, in exchange for the latter’s services; and ask us about the kinds of issues that they should discuss with these service providers prior to having us draft up a “sweat equity agreement.”  To that end, we provide this informative blog post on the topic.

First of all, if you are a startup considering entering into this type of arrangement with a service provider, please note that most startups only consider this option if: (1) they cannot get the funds from a traditional investor so as to pay for the contemplated work; (2) the cost of execution of the work is significant; (3) they consider the service provider a long-term strategic partner; and of course, (4) whatever cash savings they are realizing in this arrangement are invested at a reasonable company valuation.   

All that aside, before entering into the “sweat equity agreement,” you and the service provider will need to discuss the below topics, among others:

1. Is the service provider expecting common or preferred stock?  

2. Is the service provider expecting voting rights, or can you give them non-voting stock?  If they are expecting voting rights, can these rights be capped at their pro rata ownership in the company?

3. Is the service provider requesting to fill any seats on your board of directors?  

4. What have you discussed with the service provider as far as: (1) inclusions and exclusons in their scope of services; (2) timeline for deliverables; and (3) staying within the "budget" estimates that they provide you, so that there is no surprise requests for additional equity?  

5. What happens if you do not like their work product, or they just stop working all together because they no longer believe in your startup?  Have you discussed what happens in the event of early termination, and how and where you will resolve disputes over the scope of services or equity?

6. Have you agreed to give the service provider a certain amount of equity in exchange for different projects, or based on the work performed in phases?  

7. Once the equity is granted, will it vest all at once or vest over time?  Most founders receive their shares in the 4:1 vesting schedule. Are there ownership concerns if the service provider is subject to no vesting, or a different vesting schedule?  

8. Do you see this as a partnership?  Are there other legal structures or routes (i.e., contractual or entity-based joint ventures, profits-sharing arrangements, etc.) to consider at this time, in lieu of the sweat equity agreement?

Finally, the service provider is an investor in this situation.  So, as with any investor, you, as the startup, should not promise or indicate any certainty about your chances of a later financing round, potential buyers, or future valuation expectations.  The service provideer must make its own assumptions and reach its own conclusions, after performing its own due diligence, about the investment.

Smith Shapourian Mignano PC is available to answer any questions or concerns you may have regarding a sweat equity arranagements with third-party service providers.

This blog does not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice, and does not establish an attorney-client relationship. This blog should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney licensed or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. You should always consult a suitably qualified attorney regarding any specific legal problem or matter in a timely manner, as statutes of limitations may bar your claim.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    October 2022
    September 2022
    September 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016

    Categories

    All
    83(b) Elections
    Arbitration
    Benefit Corporation
    Bootstrapping
    Business Name
    Buy-Sell Agreement
    Cannabis
    CBD
    Cloud
    Commercial Lease
    Contracts
    Conversion
    Coronavirus
    Crowdfunding
    Delaware Flip
    Dissolution
    Early Hires
    Employers
    Employment Law
    Entrepreneurs
    Entrepreneur Spotlight
    Financials
    Funding/Financing
    GDPR
    Guest Blogger
    Health Care
    HR
    Industrial Hemp
    Insurance
    IT Solutions
    Joint Ventures
    Litigation
    LLC
    LOEN
    Logo
    Marketing
    Non Profits
    Non-Profits
    Partnerships
    Patent
    Pitch Deck
    Privacy Policy
    Professional Corporation
    Raising Money
    S Corp
    Securities
    Settlement
    Small Business
    Sole Proprietorship
    Startups
    Stock Options
    Tax
    Trademarks
    Website

    RSS Feed


​© 2022 Smith Shapourian Mignano PC.  All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy 
Terms of Use
Accessibility Statement

Attorney Advertising 
​Client Reviews & Testimonials

​

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Teela Crosthwaite Smith
    • Neda Shapourian
    • Lindsey S. Mignano
    • Kelly Lawton-Abbott
    • Jason D. Crain
    • Amy Carpio-Bruno
    • Jordan T. Lee
  • Services
  • News
  • Blog
  • DEI Policy
  • Contact